(Čl. 8) Pravo na poštovanje privatnog i porodičnog života (Ima povrede)
Lead case
European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is3. December 2024. brought, and 14. January 2025. published a verdict in the caseSimic against Serbia, No. 9172/21.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the supervision and recording of the applicant's telephone conversations, on the basis of orders of the investigating judge.The Court estimated that the
European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. December 2024. brought, and 14. January 2025. published a verdict in the caseLakatoš et al via Serbia, No. 43411/17.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged abuse of the Fourth Applicant by the Police and the absence of any investigation in this regard, as well as the alleged unfairness of the
European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. December 2024. brought, and 14. January 2025. published a verdict in the caseVasilev v. Serbia, No. 48150/18.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the non-biting to the applicant to meet the reasons on which he was revoked by his weapon posture, nor to oppose them, as they were identified as confidential.The
European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is3. December 2024. brought, and 16. January 2025. published a decision in caseMilenko Mišić and AD Freight transport Pine against Serbia, No. 59268/16.The decision isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the refusal of domestic courts to reach the compensation of the costs of misdemeanor proceedings, allegedly contrary to the
European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. December 2024. brought, and 16. January 2025. published a decision in the caseMiodragMirkovski and others against Serbia, No. 84712/17.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged uneven practice of domestic courts due to less disbursed earnings based on displacement, as well as the alleged
(P7-4) Pravo da se ne bude suđen ili kažnjen dvaput u istoj stvari - opšte (N/A)
(Čl. 37-1-a) Podnosilac predstavke ne namerava da dalje učestvuje u postupku (N/A)
Lead case
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is21. November 2024. year, and on December 12, 2024, announced the decision in the case Predrag Ćulibrk against Serbia, number 40994/21.It's a decisionpassed unanimouslythree-member Board.The applicant submitted the petition to the Court on August 5, 2021 complaining about the violation of rights from Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 to the
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) isOctober 3 passed, and on October 24, 2024, announced the verdict in the case Mitic against Serbia (number59711/21).The decision was made by a three-member Board.The case refers to the applicant's complaint that his right to a trial within a reasonable time was violated due to the length of the criminal proceedings against him before the
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) isOctober 3 made, and on October 24, 2024, announced the decision in the case Copechim Trading Ag v. Serbia (number39219/22).The decision was made by a three-member Board.The case refers to the complaint of the applicant - a business company in connection with the non-execution of a domestic judgment rendered in his favor.THE
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is on October 17, 2024. made, and on November 14 of the same year, announced the decision in the case Ljubica Marić against Serbia, number 49974/20.It's a decisionpassed unanimouslythree-member Board.The applicant submitted a petition to the Court on November 4, 2020, complaining of a violation of her rights under Article6.attitude 1
On October 15, 2024, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a decision in the case, and on November 7 of the same year Hristo Krušarski against Serbia, number 33805/20.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case concerns a civil suit for defamation filed by the applicant due to statements made by a local politician at a press conference regarding the applicant's
(Čl. 8) Pravo na poštovanje privatnog i porodičnog života (N/A)
(Čl. 35-3-a) Zloupotreba prava na predstavku (N/A)
Lead case
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is15. made on October 2024, and on November 7 of the same year announced the decision in the caseSimetic against Serbia, number 27296/22.It's a decisionbroughto three-member Board.The case refers to the failure of domestic authorities to enforce a legally binding judgment regulating the model of maintaining personal relations between the
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is15. made on October 2024, and on November 7 of the same year announced the decision in the caseRada Petrović v. Serbia, number 7861/23.It's a decisionbroughto three-member Board.The case relates to the justification and duration of detention of the applicant, who was a minor at the relevant time.The applicant complained that his
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is on September 3, 2024. passed, and on October 8, 2024, announced the verdict in the case Kajganic against Serbia, number 27958/16.It's a verdictpassed unanimouslyseven-member Council.The case refers to a newspaper article about a lawyer who represented the defendant in the proceedings regarding the assassination of Prime Minister Zoran
The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is21. May and June 25, 2024. year, and on September 17, 2024, announced the verdict in the caseYaylalı against Serbia, number15887/15.It's a verdictpassed unanimouslylo seven-member Council.The case refers to the confiscation of legally acquired jewelry from the applicant, which was owned by his wife, after the applicant failed to report