Judgments and Decisions

On September 1, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a judgment in the case, and on September 22 of the same yearĐorđević and Milosavljević v. Serbia, no. 34317/17 and 75858/17.It's a verdictbrought Board.The case refers to the uneven domestic jurisprudence regarding requests for payment of salary supplements for overtime work, night work and work during

On September 8, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a decision in the case, and on October 1 of the same year Jasmine Punda against Serbia, number 34789/23.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to an alleged violation of the principlene bis in idem, because after the dismissal of the criminal complaint, misdemeanor proceedings were initiated

On September 8, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a decision in the case, and on October 1 of the same year Kasapović against Serbia, number 14157/23.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the applicant's right to a reasoned court decision according to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph 1 of the Convention and, in that context, the

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is On September 8, 2026, he made, and on October 1 of the same year, announced the decision in the case VesnaPetrovic against Serbia, number 27905/24.It's a decision brought three-member Board.The case refers to the alleged violation of the right to peaceful enjoyment of the applicant's property due to the rejection of the request to keep

On September 8, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a decision in the case, and on October 1 of the same year MiodragDraškić against Serbia, number 33538/17.It's a decisionbrought three-member Board.The case refers to the allegedly uneven domestic judicial practice regarding requests for payment of salary supplements for overtime work, night work and work

On September 1, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) made, and on September 25 of the same year published a decision in the caseMilanKrstić and 8 others. against Serbia, number 29477/11.It's a decisionbrought Board.The case refers to the uneven domestic jurisprudence regarding the request for payment of salary supplements for overtime work, night work and work during

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is On July 7, 2026, he made, and on August 27 of the same year, announced the decision in the caseĆorović v. Serbia, number 10772/19.It's a decision brought three-member Board.The case refers to the refusal of the applicant's request to return to him in kind the property that was nationalized by his late father, and which in the meantime

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is19. May 2026. brought, a16. published the judgment in the case in June of the same year Iskrenović v. Serbia, number 39427/23.The verdict was unanimousbrought by the Council.The case refers to the applicant's conviction in misdemeanor proceedings for insulting the police, during riots caused by dissatisfaction with restrictive measures

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is12. on May 2026, and on June 9 of the same year, announced the verdict in the caseAnicic against Serbia, number 36639/22.It's a verdictbroughtseven-member Council.The case refers to the alleged unfairness of the misdemeanor proceedings conducted in connection with the traffic accident, as well as the refusal of the courts to present as

On May 5, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on June 2 of the same year, published its judgment in the caseSociety of Serbian-Chinese Friendship FDH against Serbia, number 54936/20.The verdict was unanimousbroughtseven-member Council.The case refers to the decision of the competent state authorities to ban, for reasons of public security, the public

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is19. made in May 2026, and on June 11 of the same year announced the decision in the case Pešić and others. against Serbia, no. 48973/20, 51319/20, 54565/20 and 54676/20.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the measures adopted by the Government of the Republic of Serbia to combat infectious diseasesCOVID-19,which

On May 19, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) made, and on June 11 of the same year, announced its decision in the case Vesić against Serbia, number 51420/17.It's a decisionbrought three-member Board.The case refers to the allegedly uneven domestic judicial practice regarding the request for the payment of salary compensation during the use of annual leave to members

On March 24, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on May 12 of the same year, announced its judgment in the caseYagainst Serbia, number 28322/20.The verdict was unanimousbroughta seven-member panel, with the judges being the judgesHuseynovandNí Raifeartaigh attached a joint unanimous dissenting opinion.The case relates to the termination of the applicant

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is17. passed on March 2026, and on April 7 of the same year announced the verdict in the caseCekic against Serbia, number 19083/20.The verdict was unanimousbroughtseven-member Council.The case refers to the conditions during the applicant's prison sentence in the Penal Correctional Institution in Sremska Mitrovica and the adequacy of the

On March 31, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) made, and on May 7 of the same year, published its decision in the caseJovanović et al. against Serbia, number 39827/16.It's a decisionbrought three-member Board.The case refers to allegedly uneven domestic judicial practice regarding requests for payment of salary supplements for overtime work, night work and work

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is31. made on March 2026, and on May 7, 2026, announced the decision in the caseIsufi against Serbia, number 32903/22.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the alleged failure of the state authorities to enter the applicant's name in the birth register, due to the fact that her mother, born in the Autonomous Province

On January 27, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on February 17 of the same year, announced its judgment in the caseStalović v. Serbia, number 35786/22.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case relates to the racially motivated abuse of the applicants by the police and the lack of an effective investigation in this regard.The court found that

On January 20, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued and on February 17 of the same year announced the verdict in the caseDjakovic against Serbia, number 30749/22.The verdict was unanimousbroughtseven-member Council.The case relates to the death of P.Đ, the applicant's father, who was killed during the occupation of Lovas, Republic of Croatia.The court found that

On December 16, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a judgment in the case, and on February 3, 2026, it announcedO.H. and others against Serbia, number 57185/17.The verdict was unanimousbroughtseven-member Chamber and became legally binding on May 3, 2026.The case refers to the removal of the applicants, migrants from Afghanistan, to Bulgaria after they