European Court for human rights (hereinafter: the Court) is in the period from 1. to 30.September 2025. published 2 verdicts and 4 decisions Against the Republic of Serbia.
All judgments and decisions have passed the three-member committee.
In judgmentVeskovićThe court foundviolation of rights referred to in Article 5. paragraph 3. of the Convention, assessing that the custody in which the applicant lasted for too long, while The complainant's complainants not in order to dispute the legality of its detention was not in accordance with the request of "urgency" set out in Article 5. paragraph 4 of the Convention, assessing that for the circumstances, in the circumstances of a particular case, there is no need.
The court is in the judgmentČolović found that the applicant was injuredright from Article 5, paragraph 5 of the Convention,Which right to each who was arrested or deprived of liberty in contrast to the provisions of Article 5. The conventions guarantee the essential right to compensation. The case refers to an incomplaining compensation of intangible damage to the applicant for a determined violation of the right to freedom and security at the domestic level.
Of 4 decisions made, the court is in one subject (М.H.) decided to take the petition out of his case from her case, because he assessed that There is no longer a danger that the applicant is expelled from Serbia, and that it isThe subject resolved at the domestic level. The case refers to the applicant's alleged exposure to the opposing Article 3 of the Convention in the case of return in (northern) Macedonia, as well as the risk of chain expulsion in Greece, and then in Turkey and finally in Syria.
In the subjectSvetlana Ćurčić and 3 Dr., The court isdeleted the petition from the case list by accepting the signedFriendly settlements.Subject It refers to the treatment within a reasonable time before the Constitutional Court in procedures at constitutional complaints lasting from 4 years, 1 month and 21 days to 4 years, 3 months and 10 days.
Finally, the court deleted the applications in 2 cases from the case listing signedFriendly settlements (Milojko Brkovic and 3 dr andSabaheta Turković). Items relate toUnfaccess of domestic decisions made against social / state-owned enterprises.
Friendly settlements were concluded in reducing additional costs before the court and consequently less disbursements from budget funds, as it is issues that represent a well-established court practice (the so-called.WECL - Well established Case Law).