Judgments and Decisions

On March 24, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on May 12 of the same year, announced its judgment in the caseYagainst Serbia, number 28322/20.The verdict was unanimousbroughta seven-member panel, with the judges being the judgesHuseynovandNí Raifeartaigh attached a joint unanimous dissenting opinion.The case relates to the termination of the applicant

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is17. passed on March 2026, and on April 7 of the same year announced the verdict in the caseCekic against Serbia, number 19083/20.The verdict was unanimousbroughtseven-member Council.The case refers to the conditions during the applicant's prison sentence in the Penal Correctional Institution in Sremska Mitrovica and the adequacy of the

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is31. made on March 2026, and on May 7, 2026, announced the decision in the caseIsufi against Serbia, number 32903/22.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the alleged failure of the state authorities to enter the applicant's name in the birth register, due to the fact that her mother, born in the Autonomous Province

On March 31, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) made, and on May 7 of the same year, published its decision in the caseJovanović et al. against Serbia, number 39827/16.It's a decisionbrought three-member Board.The case refers to allegedly uneven domestic judicial practice regarding requests for payment of salary supplements for overtime work, night work and work

On January 20, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued and on February 17 of the same year announced the verdict in the caseDjakovic against Serbia, number 30749/22.The verdict was unanimousbroughtseven-member Council.The case relates to the death of P.Đ, the applicant's father, who was killed during the occupation of Lovas, Republic of Croatia.The court found that

On February 3, 2026, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a decision in the case, and on March 5 of the same yearP.D. against Serbia, number 42112/21.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the measures adopted by the Republic of Serbia during the COVID-19 pandemic in connection with temporary restrictions on the freedom of movement of asylum

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is16. on December 2025, passed, and on January 27, 2026, announced the verdict in the caseStajkovic against Serbia,number 56944/17.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the non-awarding of compensation for non-material damages to the applicant for the established violation of the right to a limited period of detention

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 25. issued on November 13, 2025, and on January 13, 2026, announced the verdict in the case Pesic against Serbia, number 4545/21.The verdict was unanimousbrought More.The case refers to an article that the applicant published in May 2016 on the website of the citizens' association "Peščanik", of which she was a regular collaborator, in

On December 11, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a decision in the case and on January 22, 2026 Nenad Krstić and Miloš Mitić and 4 others. no. 35477/21, 35661/21, 35672/21, 35701/21 and 36634/21It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the request for extradition of the applicants to the United States of America and the applicants' claims

On November 18, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on December 9 of the same year, announced the verdict in the caseSaric against Serbia, number 38151/16.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to alleged irregularities in the procedure of identifying the applicant as a defendant in criminal proceedings, on the basis of which the

On October 14, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) passed, and on the 18 in November of the same year announced the verdict in the caseIskra D.O.O. against Serbia, number 53002/21.It's a verdictbroughtseven-member Council.The case relates to the demolition and seizure of the property of the applicant company and the subsequent litigation.The court found that the

On September 30, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a judgment in the case, and on November 4 of the same yearMarco Tesic against Serbia, number 61891/19.It's a verdictbroughtseven-member Council by majority vote (six votes for, one against).The case refers to the violation of the right to freedom of expression due to the imposition of a fine on the applicant

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is14. made on October 2025, and announced the decision in the case on November 20, 2025A.A. against Serbia, number 50898/20.The decision was unanimousbroughtseven-member Council.The subject was communicated to the Republic of Serbia asimpact case (case of influence).The case refers to measures adopted by the Republic of Serbia during the

On September 16, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a judgment in the case, and on October 7 of the same yearPrenca against Serbia, number 48725/12.The verdict was unanimousbrought More.The case concerns the confiscation of cash (39,500 Euros (EUR)) which the applicant tried to transfer across the state border, in violation of the relevant regulations.The

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is16. passed on September 2025, and on October 7 of the same year announced the verdict in the caseH.G.D..against Serbia, number 3158/20.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the detention of the applicant in the transit zone of Belgrade Airport for a duration of 26 days and the applicant's complaints in this regard

On September 9, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on October 7 of the same year, published its judgment in the caseŠabanović et al. against Serbia, number 39819/16.The verdict was unanimousbrought More.The case refers to allegedly uneven domestic judicial practice regarding requests for payment of salary supplements for overtime work, night work and